On 2004.01.21 15:03, Iavor S. Diatchki wrote: > hi, > not that it matters, but i think commonly when specifications say > that something is undefined, that means that the behaviour can be whatever, > i.e. the implementors can do what they like. this is not to be confused > with the entity "undefined" defined in the Prelude.
On second thought, I wouldn't think that an implementation is entitled to yield a defined value in place of bottom. Cheers, --Joe Joseph H. Fasel, Ph.D. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Planning and Analysis phone: +1 505 667 7158 University of California fax: +1 505 667 2960 Los Alamos National Laboratory post: D-2 MS F609; Los Alamos, NM 87545 _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
