In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben Rudiak-Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another extension I proposed is that the "name" of an implicit return > value can include type parameters: thus %foo Int and %foo Char would be > treated as though they had different names. This bit doesn't seem very polymorphic-friendly? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
