Hi > wouldn't it be nicer to have > - mainwrapper and call combined
mainwrapper catches all the exceptions. This may not be what you want. You end up ignoring errors again (except for the message). > - helper fucntions defined for execp "cat" etc Yes, this would be easy. > i haven't downloaded your package, but the syntax as it is looks very > verbose. i know it's a small point, but shells have to support a compact > syntax (or is the idea only to support "shell scripts" and not provide a > shell? - i was assuming you'd start ghci in a window and load this module > automatically when you open an xterm...) HsUnix is meant for shell scripts only. I don't know if it's possible to use it interactively in ghci. I don't think it's such a good idea to build a Haskell based interactive shell, anyway. Volker _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
