G'day all. Quoting JP Bernardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Would you prefix the function name with unsafe? I > wonder what is the best way to do such a marking. I would recommend not using that particular prefix. At the moment, I believe that "unsafe" is only used for functions which could potentially cause a core dump if misused. What we have here is a function whose domain is some subset of the entire set of values which can be passed to it, but fails to check this. As a suggestion, how about calling functions like this "uncheckedFoo", but also providing a "foo" which is checked? Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
