"Serge D. Mechveliani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander is right.
>
> Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
> I would suggest for the future standard Haskell library to have
> Integer as default. For example:
> length :: [a] -> Integer
> smallLength :: [a] -> Int
Hmm...isn't it possible to use a class here? Perhaps even Num?
class Num a where ....
:
length :: [b] -> a
:
-kzm
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
