> > -- It's kind of like an converse map. > > I have attempted, unsuccessfully, to write flist above in a point-free > manner. Is it possible?
> Of course it is, but why? > flist = flip (map . flip ($)) Some functions are simpler point-free, others are simpler with points. I was curious about this one (I like the pointwise version better). Also, the statement "It's kind of like a converse map" becomes quite clear from the point-free way to write it, while still not so obvious in the pointwise version. Jacques _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
