I am looking at trying to produce XML with Haskell and it appears there are at least two dominant options: HaXML and WASH.
I read some of the Peter Thiemann paper on the reason he chose a different architecture from HaXML but don't feel like I am in a position to judge the merits (and given the age of the paper) am not sure those issues weren't addressed in a subsequent version of HaXML. In reading the HaXML documentation, it appears to rely on DRIFT for some of its functionality. But I also undersand that DRIFT is being phased out in favor of TemplateHaskell. Is there a consensus on how to produce XML (from Haskell types) if one is starting a project today? -Alex- ______________________________________________________________ S. Alexander Jacobson tel:917-770-6565 http://alexjacobson.com _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
