[Haskell] Re: Hierarchical module namespace extension not sufficiently flexible

[Andre Pang]

On 06/03/2005, at 11:23 PM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We can do it too except that to use qualified names, users would have 
to
import dozens of modules:
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther.
Not that this is a fantastic solution (and perhaps you're doing this 
already), but one technique is to make a module named Graphics.UI.Gtk 
(i.e. Graphics/UI/Gtk.hs), which imports all the submodules for you and 
re-exports all of them:

    module Graphics.UI.Gtk
      ( Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
      , Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
      , Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther
      )
    where
    import Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
    import Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
    import Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther
(or you can call the module Graphics.UI.Gtk.all, or something.)  It's 
somewhat feasible to do if you're machine-generating it, but obviously 
pretty unmaintainable if you have to write it all by hand ...

--
% Andre Pang : trust.in.love.to.save
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell