On 2005-09-09, Keean Schupke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keean Schupke wrote: > >>>>> I'm not sure exactly what you have in mind. Obviously I want something >>>>> that applies to all functions, with any number of arguments, and not >>>>> just (+). Furthermore, it should handle cases like 1+[2,3] where only >>>>> one value is monadic. >>>> > Just noticed the 1+[1,2] case... I am not certain whether this is > possible - it is outside the > scope of the formal definiton of Haskell and may rely on implementation > details of the compiler/interpreter. > > Effectivly we need to redefine list as a class, then (Num a) can be made > an instance of the class... See my implementation of Joy in the HList > library. (this lifts numbers into an AST rather than a list) - this > however uses type level programming and has problems with non static > types (IE you need to use existentials for lists who's values is not > known at compile time)... > > The easy answer is to define a type that contains both singletons and > lists... although the type constructors may not look as neat.
I thought the easy answer would be to inject non-monadic values into the monad (assuming one already rejiggered things to do automatic lifting). -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
