Hello Udo,
Friday, September 16, 2005, 7:19:49 PM, you wrote:
>> do x <- newIORef 0
>> y <- newIORef 0
>> z <- newIORef 0
>> z := *x + *y -- translated to { x' <- readIORef x; y' <- readIORef y;
>> writeIORef z (x'+y') }
US> May I humbly suggest you explain what problem you are actually trying to
US> solve here? I've never felt the need to hide monadic binding behind
US> fancy syntax, defining some combinator was always sufficient. I mean...
US> if you want C, you know where to find it. If possible I'd rather not
US> see the same programming "style" in Haskell.
you absolutely true - i need sometimes C and don't think to use it
just to write several lines, such as when i need to compute CRC of
data stream
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
