On 2005-09-16, S. Alexander Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am now using implicit parameters quite happily. But I also feel the > need for the reverse. There are occasions where I want to pass a > value back through the set of calling functions e.g. produce HTTP > cache header info through functions that are not really about that. > > I am not sure how this would work, but it strikes me as useful. > Anything like that in the offing?
Monads. Implicit parameters can be thought of as co-monad. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
