Dear Haskell folk One of the interesting things about ICFP was the number of times GADTs came up, either in papers or in discussions in the breaks. Francois's invited talk was very inspiring, and that was just the beginning.
Stephanie and Dimitrios and I are now busy revising our wobbly-types GADT paper (which is implemented in GHC, but never published http://research.microsoft.com/%7Esimonpj/papers/gadt/index.htm). We have a *far* simpler story now... but that means it'll reject some programs that would be accepted by the earlier version. We don't think this loss of expressiveness is important, but we'd like to check. Hence this message: If you use GADTs, would you to send us your GADT code, so we can check that we can still compile it? (A secondary reason for asking is that it'd be interesting just to see the way you are using GADTs.) If you send your code just to me, I'll collect it. You could a) send a complete Haskell program, which should compile and run b) send a Haskell module, or collection of modules, which should compile, but which isn't a complete program c) send a Haskell module using GADTs, but lacking the support modules that would enable it to compile d) send Omega code, which GHC won't understand, but which demonstrates some cunning use of GADTs All of these would be useful, even (c) and (d) --- we can eyeball the code. As a bonus, in the case of (a) or (b) I'll add your code to GHC's regression suite, so that all future releases will guarantee to run your code. [Or at least if not it'll be deliberate!] Tell me if you'd like this; it'll become visible in GHC's CVS repository. Thanks Simon _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
