On 11/11/05, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just so that people don't get the wrong idea ... > > - It's just an experiment of mine with the backend that turns out to > have sparked some interest. It seems to compile most of Haskell 98 (at > least it did when it last worked ;-)) but it's in no way an industrial > strength compiler yet.
I'm curious. Can you be more specific about what you thought wanted/needed changing in nhc98's VM and/or compiler? I haven't played around with nhc98 yet, but I was intrigued by its small size and its (modestly-sized and simple) bytecoded implementation. Should I now be more interested in Yhc instead? ;-) I'd like to build a web-publishing framework in Haskell that is totally self-contained, very portable, and easy to bootstrap ... and nhc98 or Yhc might be a nice place to start. Are you documenting your thoughts about the Yhc implementation somewhere? Cheers, - David -- There's more than one way to do it: the Perl way, and the _right_ way. _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
