On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 08:54:35AM -0500, David Roundy wrote: > As an aside, what's responsible for the insanity of pattern matching record > fields being backwards? I'd bar = b to bind b to bar, not the other way > around... why should record pattern matching use '=' in a manner opposite > from the rest of Haskell?
Perhaps it's better to think of '=' as asserting equality, than as binding? Andrew _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
