On 2006-01-31, Cale Gibbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The point about monads being a design pattern I actually wouldn't take > too much exception to, except for the fact that I don't really like > the term "design pattern" in the first place. :) Too often, the things > people call design patterns are just ordinary functions or general > interfaces in a more expressive programming language.
Right. I'd call haskell's typeclasses excellent language support for formalizing and truly taking advantage of design patterns where appropriate. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
