On 3/27/06, Robert Dockins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd love to see Haskell on highly concurrent hardware becoming more > of a reality: Haskell on the Cell is a great idea;
>From what I've heard, programmers of games for next-gen consoles (XBox 360 and PS3) are having a hard time using all available cores effectively. Tim Sweeney (founder of Epic games, these days probably best known for his work on the Unreal game engine) talked about some of these issues in his POPL talk (http://www.st.cs.uni-sb.de/edu/seminare/2005/advanced-fp/docs/sweeny.pdf). There are some interesting details on the characteristics of code that goes into modern games, and he thinks there is lots of room for (lazy) functional programming. There are some nits that he doesn't like about Haskell, but the overall direction of the language is the right one. There is a long discussion of this talk on Lambda the Ultimate (http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1277) in which Sweeney took part. One interesting quote from him: " do believe [garbage collecting memory] is completely practical as the sole memory management solution, even in a realtime application like a game." It's true that games development does not fulfill all of the criteria Paul set out as the ideal niche for Haskell to take and grow by stealth to world domination: it is way too big and visible a market. But it does seem like it would be worthwhile to push existing Haskell compilers to support multicore CPUs and eventually to include more extreme multicore cases like the Cell. Davor _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
