On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:22:21PM -0700, Luke Evans wrote: > Here are a few 'highlights' from our feature list: > - A lazily evaluated, strictly-typed language called CAL, with many > similarities to Haskell
Do you think that CAL would be a good target for a Haskell compiler? In other words, would it be a good idea to use CAL as an intermediate language for a Haskell -> Java byte-code compiler? Best regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
