G'day all.

Quoting Alex Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> It seems really unnecessarily verbose.  Having to add the OPTION header

...which you don't need; this could go on the command line...

> It is even more of a beat-down to have to add a deriving
> clause for every newtype to make this all work nicely.

One neat fix would be for newtype-deriving to work with one of the
typeclass synonym extensions (which aren't implemented yet).

Cheers,
Andrew Bromage
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Reply via email to