On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Peter Padawitz wrote:
> Is f(~p(x))=e(x) semantically equivalent to: f(z)=e(x) where p(x)=z?

Yes.

PS: I saw that twice

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Reply via email to