Am Samstag, 14. Juli 2007 23:04 schrieb Vivian McPhail: > […] > They say that haskell programmers are normally averse to dependent types.
So I’m far away from being normal. > […] > What are peoples' thoughts on adding dependent types to haskell as a > non-incremental evolutionary step? I think that a functional language with dependent types is a great thing but I doubt that it is good to extend Haskell in this regard since the presence of bottom is problematic in the context of dependent types. And if you want to use the power of dependent types effectively, you’ll often have to use some kind of specialized editor which removes some of the additional work which is introduced by using dependent types. So I think, it’s more reasonable to improve a system like Epigram to get a system which is applicable to real world problems. > […] Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell