Yup, my call graph constructor jst tracks statically resolved call instructions and splices them to get the whole program graph; no indirections. I could rewrite the tool, but tracking jmp *%eax would be tad too complicated! I'd try JHC meanwhile.
Stefen, Simon and David, thanks again for the inputs. -ganesh On 10/5/07, David Menendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/4/07, Ganesh Narayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > True, but I was of the opinion that -O0, -fno-state-hack and > > -fno-full-laziness would preserve the calling structure with minimal > > perturbance. Wouldn't it? Besides, I am hardly aware of any utility that > > generates source level call graph/expression dependence graph; suppose > one > > can generate a module dependency graph, but guess its little too coarse! > > You might have more luck with JHC, which (if I understand correctly) > creates intermediate C code that somewhat resembles the Haskell source > in structure. > > -- > Dave Menendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/> >
_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
