there was a thread about xml parsing, one month ago. <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/44708> well, i don't know much about xml, except what it looks like; but i know about that interesting parsing problem behind it. maybe Lev Walkin has fixed that in HXML. at least he wrote this patch... <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/45033>
- marc ----- sometimes i think, i should write a paper about it. but then... naah, i'm like haskell: non-strict. Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2008 schrieb Krasimir Angelov: > Hi, > > Does some one have made performance tests on the different XML libraries for > Haskell? I have a 20MB xml file that I want to read. I remember from my > earlier experiments (years ago) that all libraries were too slow and were > consuming too much memory. I hoped that this situation had changed but maybe > not. I looked at HaXML, libxml, HXML and HXT. HaXML eats a lot of memory and > is still very slow. libxml is unfinished binding to the C library. Currently > it only allows to create documents. HXML seems to be very promising. It > works fast and it doesn't eat memory. Unfortunately it is that it seems to > be rather old. It uses its own Arrow and Tree libraries instead of the > standard libraries. I have not jumped into HXT yet because it seems to be > very large library. Could someone recomend which one is the state of the > art? > > Best Regards, > Krasimir >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
