Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 11:05 schrieb Malcolm Wallace: > The problem with a top-level namespace like FRP is that it is a cryptic > acronym: it means nothing to a novice, and may be easily confused with > other acronyms by an expert. I believe top-level names should _at_the_ > _very_least_ be minimally descriptive of the category of things that > live in it. > > So, I'd be fine with Control.Reactive.FRP, Control.Reactive.Yampa, etc, > or even just Reactive.Yampa etc.
Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then? Under Control.Reactive.Reactive? Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell