Sounds great! I have some vague ideas about what the comparison might reveal -- but I expect to learn quite a bit in the process, and use that to improve reform. There is definitely room for more than one form validation library. They all have shortcomings, and I am hoping something even better will come along some day :)
- jeremy On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Jasper Van der Jeugt <[email protected]> wrote: > Congrats on the release! > > I would like to help out with the full comparison since I have some > knowledge and experience on the subject. Because of the different > approach, I think there's definitely room for two libraries. > > Cheers, > Jasper > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Felipe Almeida Lessa > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I hope to do a full comparison of reform vs digestive-functors 0.3 vs >>> yesod forms in a few weeks. >> >> That would be awesome! Just sayin' =). >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Felipe. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "HAppS" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/happs?hl=en. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
