On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 22:08, Jens-Ulrik Petersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Since we appear to only update most things with Stackage, it makes >> sense to not have release monitoring enabled. I've largely ignored bug >> reports from it, since that requires a large rebuild of things even to >> do. > > > Right, same here, Elliott > >> >> However, koschei and release-monitoring are unrelated. The only real >> relation is that if we actually act on release-monitoring bugs, then >> koschei runs might have some use. But along those lines, if we stop >> release-monitoring, then there's not so much point to running koschei >> for most packages. It might still be useful when the package depends >> on non-Haskell things though. > > > Okay, my knowledge of Koschei is weak, my logic was that release-monitoring > creates the bugs which then triggers Koschei builds. So at least in the long > term opting out of Anitya would stop the Koschei building, I thought? > Or am I missing something more on Koschei? Is it possible to opt out > of Koschei separately? >
Anitya (release-monitoring) checks for new versions, and the-new-hotness files bugs when there are releases. It will also run a scratch build if the package has monitoring set that way. Koschei runs rebuilds all the time, if *dependencies* have changed. They are independent things. > Thanks, Jens -- Elliott _______________________________________________ haskell mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
