On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:14:36PM -0700, Mischa Spiegelmock wrote: > And to think some people actually have the nerve to claim UNIX-style > operating systems are not user-friendly! > Here we are, in the year two thousand and six of our Lord, and UNIX > commands still somehow manage to be as hateful as ever. > Anyway, the subject of my hate tonight is the command to list > processes, also known as "ps." (Which may I point out is a horribly > unintuitive name in itself, but I digress). > > I'm sitting there trying to remember how to display output in "tree" > mode. > The ps usage tells me, and I quote: "f ASCII art forest" > It's a forest because it has trees. Get it?
Actually, yes, just as per the definition of "tree" and "forest" in graph theory; cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_%28graph_theory%29 > Great UNIX, just great. Well, strictly speaking, the output of "ps f" is, indeed, not necessarily a tree - unless you're really listing either a single tree or the whole thing right down from "init". But, yeah, I can see how the use of "forest" here might seem either a bit too obscure or a bit too poetic for some tastes :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence no verb.
pgpQDrOleMrwZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
