> Like I said, you _can_ do this, but it won't work in IE. The spec is > eight years old, so blame Microsoft, not the W3, though they should be > shot for other reasons (XSLT, for instance). Just read the damned link:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.html#anonymous-boxes I *did* read the damned link. It *doesnt* describe what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about "make a <UL> look like a table", I'm talking about "with this .css file, the navigation box is on the right, with that .css file, it's on the left", without having to put the navigation box in a float and play games with layers to drop the box in different places. I'm saying "I agree with the original decision that using tables for overall layout was a bad idea... but not because they were called "tables", but because using HTML for layout is a bad idea". Calling them a "STACK" of "ROW"s instead of a "TABLE" of "TR"s doesn't change that.
