* Stephen Deken <[email protected]> [2006-10-03 17:10]: > While it did start out as a music player on the Mac side, it's > always been integrated with iPod+iTMS on the Windows side.
How? It's the exact same app on both platforms. If it's decent on the Mac, it will be decent on Windows (unless the suckiness is in the fact that the UI doesn't translate well from Aqua to Win, but noone's made that complaint so far). > There are better music players for Windows. (For that matter, > if all you want to do is *play* music, there are better music > players for the Mac as well.) There's gobs of them here and > there. I'm still partial to WinAmp 2. The filesystem is not a good way to organise music. For small libraries it's OK. To navigate big ones, it blows. WinAmp and its entourage of clones is only tolerable in that they don't foist a hateful solution for that problem on you, but that doesn't make them good. iTunes makes a decent stab at the problem, interface-wise. It has very peculiar ideas in various implementation aspects, though. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
