On 11/10/06, Sean O'Rourke <[email protected]> wrote:
And end up further into the other Great Ruby Hate of giving
programs "clever" names you'll never guess?  Does the library
dealing with X have X in its name, or is it named something
"cute" and impossible to find, like "sediment" or "ant"?

To be fair, Ruby didn't start this.  Java did the same thing with
JavaBeans, albeit with a lesser degree of hate.  At least `jar` wasn't
named `coffeecan`.

But I agree -- I don't see what would have been so bad about
`ruby-pkg` or `ruby-build`.

--sjd;

Reply via email to