Peter da Silva wrote: > Now I think about this, I think the real problem is that xargs is > inherently hateful.
What's hateful is the shell or OS (I can't be bothered to remember
which) which makes it necessary - namely the limitation on how long your
command line can be. Without that, xargs need not exist and so would be
free of hate.
--
David Cantrell | London Perl Mongers Deputy Chief Heretic
When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life
-- Samuel Johnson
