On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:22 -0400, Chris Devers wrote: > On Aug 15, 2007, at 6:43 PM, David Cantrell wrote: > > > Close, but no cigar. What really is spectacularly hateful is that the > > latest and greatest (and most expensive, of course) version of Acrobat > > can infest documents with sounds and even video. > > Surely this is the natural outcome of trying to blend PDF, which one > would suppose is naturally a medium for the digital equivalent of > static printed content, with Flash, which one would suppose is > naturally a medium for dynamic content, on grounds that they now > belong to the same company, and that company wants to have one plugin > on all the world's web browsers. > > It comes soo..... close... to making sense. > > Almost.
PHB: But static content is just dynamic content that isn't moving! ENG: Uh-oh we lose. Cheers, Martin.
