On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:53:28PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Also, wrapping the malloc is not *always* a bad thing to do: there are > mallocs out there that do things you wouldn't expect, e.g. if you try > to malloc() zero bytes. (Yes, there are legitimate reasons to do that.)
C89 - we've heard of it. [And if the world hasn't got C89 right yet, what hope is there for C99?] Nicholas Clark
