Somewhere on Shadow Earth, at Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 05:41:46AM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote: > On 2008-07-03, at 21:27, Phil Pennock wrote: >> It's not what they want, because the people using HTML-capable >> mail-clients would also see the text. > > Then they should include a text version of the HTML. > > Or not include the text at all. > > Including text that is NOT an "alternative" version of the HTML is the > wrong solution no matter what their goal.
Exactly my point! Thank you, very much. That is my hate, that they are not including a plain-text version of the message, whilst simultaneously claiming that they are. -- Timothy Knox <mailto:t...@thelbane.com> The one thing I've learned about freedom of expression is that you really ought to keep that sort of thing to yourself. -- Scott Adams, _I'm Not Anti-Business, I'm Anti-Idiot_
