On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Peter da Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, I can dig that Apple's new last.fm-style music recommendation system is
> just starting up, so their Genius doesn't have as broad a musical taste as
> me, but it doesn't even seem to reliably know about tracks that I *know* are
> in the iTunes store. And it's not that I don't have them tagged correctly,
> because they were able to find the album artwork for them. Updating Genius
> takes forever, too.

I've found that it's even better than that. I seem to have such
eclectic taste that the only music I have that genius likes is 80s and
classic rock. I only put that on when I have guests who don't
appreciate the likes of Sonny Sharrock, Ode Hazelwood, and the other
non-mainstream artists that comprise the majority of my listening.
Even the tracks I bought from the ITMS are not available for genius,
for the most part.

Even better, I bought a one-hit wonder song from Amazon that I know
should work for Genius, and even though it's named exactly the same as
the itunes store it still isn't available for genius.

I used to have some albums where only certain tracks worked with
genius, but I just tried some of those and they seem to work now.
Perhaps Apple's processing tracks in order of popularity?

> I used to use a social playlist system that worked with iTunes, and worked
> MUCH better than Genius, but I seem to have misplaced the software, and
> can't remember enough details (like the name) to google it. It was faster,
> more reliable, and didn't care where the music came from originally. I'm
> wondering now if Apple borged them and turned their code into Idiot.

No, I think the problem is that Apple's NIH syndrome is returning.
They did well for the first 5-6 years of OSX in not reinventing the
wheel, but that's gone out the window recently. If they had just
borged something it would have turned out a lot better.

Apple is the world's biggest VAR, but they've forgotten that.

-Zach

Reply via email to