> > (Is being "actually totally wrong" different from just being > > "wrong"?) > > Yes: what you wrote was wrong on multiple levels and did not > incorporate any individually correct statements.
OK, fair enough! > > > It's a very misconception, though, > > > > Yes. It's very. > > The missing word was "common," obviously. Did I miss something? No, just that I when I read it, so I thought I'd highlight it and perhaps make a few other people as well. Cheers. Smylers
