-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter da Silva wrote:

> Or is that Fink? The fact that there's two competing ports-based systems
> for OS X is a third layer of hate.

That's fink.  And you can thank darwinports for making their own system
after fink was already stable, because Apple wanted their own non-GPL'd
packaging system that they then abandoned.  ;)  (there's a longer
version of that story involving competing factions within Apple, but
well, it just hurts to remember it.)

> Especially when the native OS X packaging scheme (bundles and
> frameworks) has advantages over both, but neither of them use it.

In a perfect world, where open-source software was written to be modular
that would potentially be an option.  In the real-world, nearly 0
open-source packages would transition to bundles/frameworks without a
billion man-hours of work because they expect to spew their resources
all over the filesystem with hardcoded unixisms.

Also, Apple's built-in installer package management is only an
installer, not a package manager.  It has no intelligence as to what
happens after things get installed (other than writing a manifest of
what it did, completely oblivious to whether it overwrote things in
other packages' manifests, etc.)

That is slightly not true on 10.5 and up, since they added a bit more
smarts to it, but if you want to support any older OSX releases you
basically forgo all the advantages of the stuff they've added.


- --
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development

Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/
Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJXnVSUu+jZtP2Zf4RAv9oAJwJl07IUOauYPpMuErAcepsCz20DQCdHIVn
RzAeZ/9+1/FvQhyfh2r/PP8=
=SBrT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to