Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:31:43PM -0400, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: >> Nicholas Clark wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 01:48:32PM -0700, Joshua Juran wrote: >>>> On Jun 26, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> I offer you this software that I've only just written. I don't >>>>>> think that >>>>>> it's that hateful: >>>>>> [likely won't be usefully portable to any OS that forbids deleting >>>>>> open files, and keeps the files corresponding files open.] >>>>> Or when invoked via $PATH rather than with an explicit path. >>>> Or via symbolic link. >>> Oh right. So I should use autoconf to detect things like readlink, >> ---------------------------+^ Your problem right there. >> >>> /proc/self/exe and the like, and hence make it find itself better, and thus >>> make it less hateful? :-) > > -------------------------+^ There was a reason for this. > > autoconf, automake and libtool. What more could one need?
There's a distinct lack of XML in your solution. > Actually, what other non-overlapping software could one legitimately use to > increase the hate? > > Nicholas Clark > >
