Sigh. Yes. That test is very problematic. --- Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Groschupf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: test suite > > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapred.TestTableIndex FAILED > (timeout) > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapred.TestTableIndex > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > > Testcase: unknown took 0.05 sec > Caused an ERROR > Timeout occurred > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Timeout occurred > > > > Thats all I have, sounds this familiar? > > Thanks. > Stefan > > > > On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Jim Kellerman wrote: > > > If the test suite doesn't pass, that's a problem. What tests failed? > > > > And you can run single tests if you want. > > > > Wrt Windows, I use cygwin, but the problem is not unix > commands, but > > code in HBase that deletes files and directories. FileSystem.delete > > behaves differently on unix vs Windows. What we should be doing for > > directories is use FileUtil.deleteFully > > > > --- > > Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Stefan Groschupf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:15 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: test suite > >> > >>> Since HBase is targeted to run on hdfs and not the local > >> file system, > >>> we want to test it in its "native" environment and not a > >> mock-up which > >>> might not have all the ideosynchracies of the "real thing". > >> > >> Jim, I agree there should be integration tests that run > against the > >> hdfs - that can run on hudon. However there should be unit test > >> that test code units of hbase not of hadoop. Those should > not use the > >> dfs since the idea of unit tests is not test underlaying > third party > >> systems. > >> > >> Anyhow just a user feedback the test suite as it is today is not > >> useful for me personal, since first, it never passed on my box and > >> second it takes 30 min to run - so I never run it > >> - what is not the idea of having a test suite and never > run it during > >> development. > >> > >> Just some feedback... > >> > >> Stefan > >> > >> > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG. > >> Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1318 - Release > >> Date: 3/7/2008 2:01 PM > >> > >> > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1318 - Release Date: > > 3/7/2008 2:01 PM > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 101tec Inc. > Menlo Park, California, USA > http://www.101tec.com > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1318 - Release > Date: 3/7/2008 2:01 PM > > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1318 - Release Date: 3/7/2008 2:01 PM
