+1 on release PE with 4 clients runs in 1G of memory.
--- Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > -----Original Message----- > From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 2) > > +1 on release. > > I did load tests and checked the documentation looks good. > > This candidate may run worse than recent hbases' under load. > I got NSREs and timeout failures when running with 8 > concurrent clients using PE but it completed PE random and > sequential Writes with 4 concurrent clients -- the test I use > to figure whether to vote on a hadoop candidate. > > This candidate would have been better with a fix for > HBASE-505 included but we can add that later and make a 0.1.1 > in a week or so. > > St.Ack > > > > stack wrote: > > Here is a third candidate (candidate count is zero-based). > Candidate > > 1 bundle was corrupt. > > > > Please download and try it out: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.0-candidate-2/ > > > > Does this candidate work for you? Do unit tests pass on your > > hardware? Is the documentation sufficient? > > > > Should we release this? I'll leave the vote close at > Thursday, March > > 27th. > > > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1346 - Release > Date: 3/27/2008 10:03 AM > > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1346 - Release Date: 3/27/2008 10:03 AM
