Jim,

When is 0.18.0 supposed to be released? If soon, +1 on not supporting 0.17.
If not, +1 on having a 0.3 branch that only targets 0.18.

J-D

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Jim Kellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Should hbase-0.3.0 just be hbase-0.2.0 compiled against hadoop-0.18 ?
>
> Should the functionality targeted for hbase-0.3.0 be deferred until
> hbase-0.4.0 ?
>
> We need to support hadoop-0.18, however hadoop is making major changes in
> 0.19 such as requiring Java6.
>
> Should we:
> - not support 0.17 at all and go to 0.18?
> - build a release (0.3.0) that targets hadoop-0.18 but incorporates no new
> features or bug fixes?
>
> hbase-0.2.0 has had a long development cycle and it needs to be released
> SOON!
>
> We need a release of hbase that supports hadoop-0.18. Should we ditch the
> features planned for hbase-0.3 and make the only difference from 0.2 that it
> requires hadoop-0.18, and move new features to hbase-0.4 which will target
> hadoop-0.19?
>
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
>

Reply via email to