+1 on latest trunk. Ran integration tests that depend on hbase, and small "stress" test. All passed.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Rong-en Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1, agree with Jim. I would say that during RC cycle, we should not do > changes other than bug fixes. > > Except this, the rest part has +1 (I'm running latest trunk minus 796, > all good). > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Jim Kellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1 With the late inclusion of HBASE-796, there are a number of examples > in javadoc that still reference Text, and I found (without an exhaustive > search) classes that still have un-deprecated methods that accept text: > e.g., HColumnDescriptor, HMsg, HBaseAdmin, BatchUpdate. There may be more. > > > > My opinion: either back out 796 for 0.2.0 (because 0.3.0 will only > address a handful of bugs before hadoop-0.19 is out there) and include 796 > in 0.3.0, removing the deprecated methods in 0.4.0 (tied to hadoop-0.19) or > going through 0.2.0 with a fine tooth comb and changing examples that use > Text and finishing the deprecating of methods. > > > > --- > > Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:43 PM > >> To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: [ANN] hbase-0.2.0 Release Candidate 2 > >> > >> This is the second 0.2.0 release candidate. It is available > >> for download here: > >> > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.2.0-candidate-2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.2.0-candidate-2/> > >> > >> Please take this candidate for test drive. Check the > >> documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc. > >> > >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.2.0? Vote yes or > >> no before Friday, August 8th. > >> > >> See [4] below for list of fixes since RC1. Thanks to all > >> involved testing and fixing bugs in this second RC. > >> > >> Yours, > >> The HBase Team > >> > >> P.S. Release 0.2.0 has over 250 issues resolved [1] since the > >> branch for > >> 0.1 hbase was made. Be warned that hbase 0.2.0 is not > >> backward compatible with the hbase 0.1 API. See [2] Izaak > >> Rubins' notes on the high-level API differences between 0.1 > >> and 0.2. For notes on how to migrate your 0.1 era hbase data > >> to 0.2, see Izaak's migration guide [3]. To run 0.2.0 on > >> hadoop 0.18.0, replace the 0.17.1 jars under $HBASE_HOME/lib > >> with their 0.18.x equivalents and then recompile. > >> > >> 1. > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version > > =12312955&styleName=Html&projectId=12310753&Create=Create > >> 2. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/Plan-0.2/APIChanges > >> 3. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToMigrate > >> 4. > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?rese > > t=true&&pid=12310753&updated%3Aprevious=-1w+3d&status=5&status=6> > &sorter/field=updated&sorter/order=DESC > >> > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > >> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1592 - Release > >> Date: 8/5/2008 6:03 AM > >> > > >
