[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662732#action_12662732
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-24:
----------------------------

Hey Luo Ning:

So I understand correctly, you are saying that rather than a timeout of 0 for 
dfs.datanode.socket.write.timeout as we suggest elsewhere, you say that it 
should be set say to the current default of 8 minutes?

Also, rather than keep raising the xceiverCount as more regions are added, 
you're saying that it should be bounded -- at the current default of 256? -- 
otherwise the OOME about can't create thread, etc?

How many regions per server with your patch in place Luo Ning?

Thanks

> Scaling: Too many open file handles to datanodes
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: stack
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.20.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-823.patch, MonitoredReader.java
>
>
> We've been here before (HADOOP-2341).
> Today the rapleaf gave me an lsof listing from a regionserver.  Had thousands 
> of open sockets to datanodes all in ESTABLISHED and CLOSE_WAIT state.  On 
> average they seem to have about ten file descriptors/sockets open per region 
> (They have 3 column families IIRC.  Per family, can have between 1-5 or so 
> mapfiles open per family -- 3 is max... but compacting we open a new one, 
> etc.).
> They have thousands of regions.   400 regions -- ~100G, which is not that 
> much -- takes about 4k open file handles.
> If they want a regionserver to server a decent disk worths -- 300-400G -- 
> then thats maybe 1600 regions... 16k file handles.  If more than just 3 
> column families..... then we are in danger of blowing out limits if they are 
> 32k.
> We've been here before with HADOOP-2341.
> A dfsclient that used non-blocking i/o would help applications like hbase 
> (The datanode doesn't have this problem as bad -- CLOSE_WAIT on regionserver 
> side, the bulk of the open fds in the rapleaf log, don't have a corresponding 
> open resource on datanode end).
> Could also just open mapfiles as needed, but that'd kill our random read 
> performance and its bad enough already.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to