+1 on RC2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Daniel Cryans
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:50 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: ANN: hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 2 (WAS -> Re: ANN:
> hbase-0.19.1 release candidate 1)
>
> Have been running 0.19.1 candidate 1 since last week in all our envs
> and it works really well. Even tho candidate 2 is a tiny bit
> different, I still +1
>
> J-D
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:32 PM, stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I've posted a new release candidate here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.19.1-candidate-2/
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.19.1?
> >
> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Wednesday,
> > the 18th of March.
> >
> > Here is the list of issues addressed: http://tinyurl.com/c3em9m
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:17 PM, stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree that our not working with Cascading is sufficient cause to
> sink the
> >> release.
> >>
> >> Going back over commit logs,
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1240 was incompletely
> >> applied. The compareTo went in but the earlier addition of the
> RowResult
> >> implements Comparable failed to apply .
> >>
> >> My fault for not noticing the misapplication. Let me put up a new
> >> candidate soon.
> >>
> >> Thanks Erik,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Erik Holstad
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> >>
> >>> -1 on rc 19.1. To get Cascading and HBase working properly with
> each other
> >>> we need RowResult to be comparable.
> >>> This is very important for all those people that want to be able to
> write
> >>> MR
> >>> jobs for HBase using Cascading, because
> >>> it is not going to work without it. A patch was submitted for this
> issue
> >>> but didn't make it into the release candidate.
> >>>
> >>> Regards Erik
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >