[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12707694#action_12707694
]
stack commented on HBASE-1304:
------------------------------
@holstad
I'm fine using Bytes instead of ImmutableBytes. We just need to add the
deprecated to ImmutableBytes.... Would we have to move Bytes to io package?
Maybe best to just leave Bytes as utility class. Hadoop has BytesWritable
already taken but its not what we want. Bytes should be instantiable so we can
use it in things like Map<Bytes>. I like that bit of utility (though we should
be careful where its used -- don't want to introduce new class instantiation
when not needed and after doing all the work purging them).
Good stuff.
> New client server implementation of how gets and puts are handled.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1304
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.20.0
> Reporter: Erik Holstad
> Assignee: Jonathan Gray
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.20.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-1304-v1.patch, HBASE-1304-v2.patch,
> HBASE-1304-v3.patch
>
>
> Creating an issue where the implementation of the new client and server will
> go. Leaving HBASE-1249 as a discussion forum and will put code and patches
> here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
