Hmmm, jira seems to be down. So I'm resorting to email. I wget'd the thrift code from their site and compiled it myself. Using the jar that's in trunk probably makes more sense. Also I used java 1.6, I can't remember, do we require that for the 0.19 anyway? Naming it libthrift-0.1RC1.jar might be better then just libthrift (I don't think the one in trunk is RC1 though?), that's just how it came out of the thrift build process.
~Tim. 2009/5/29 stack (JIRA) <[email protected]> > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12714549#action_12714549] > > stack commented on HBASE-1456: > ------------------------------ > > Andrew: Did you remove the old thrift lib? Did you build after applying > Tim's patch? Did you rebuild your client? > > Tim, on commit, I should name the jar libthrift-0.1RC1.jar? Is it same as > the libthrift in TRUNIK? > > > Backport thrift 0.1.0 changes to branch 0.19 > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: HBASE-1456 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1456 > > Project: Hadoop HBase > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: thrift > > Affects Versions: 0.19.2 > > Reporter: Tim Sell > > Fix For: 0.19.2 > > > > Attachments: HBASE-1456-v0.19.2.patch, libthrift.jar > > > > > > Since so much in thrift has changed between the ancient version used in > this branch and thrift 0.1.0, it will be useful to have a backport patch of > all the changes so far. > > There are some api tweaks. Like, gets returning lists, and just being > empty when nothing was found instead of throwing NotFound. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
