[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728855#action_12728855
]
stack commented on HBASE-1627:
------------------------------
IOE seems overly broad (almost everything is IOE at its base).
Above looks like a bug in TIFB. It should have been changed to handle STE
instead of USE. If you are good with making this change, I'll commit your
patch changing your overly general IOE to STE?
> TableInputFormatBase#nextKeyValue catches the wrong exception
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1627
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1627
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.20.0
> Reporter: Doğacan Güney
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: tableinput.patch
>
>
> TableInputFormatBase#nextKeyValue only catches UnknownScannerException from
> Scanner.next. However, scanner may throw other exceptions:
> {code}
> /* from HTable.ClientScanner#next */
> try {
> values = getConnection().getRegionServerWithRetries(callable);
> } catch (IOException e) {
> if (e instanceof UnknownScannerException &&
> lastNext + scannerTimeout < System.currentTimeMillis()) {
> ScannerTimeoutException ex = new ScannerTimeoutException();
> ex.initCause(e);
> throw ex;
> }
> throw e;
> }
> {code}
> Is there any reason why TIFB does not catch ScannerTimeoutException?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
