[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonathan Gray updated HBASE-1759:
---------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 0.20.0

> Ability to specify scanner caching on a per-scan basis
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1759
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1759
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.0
>            Reporter: Ken Weiner
>            Assignee: Ken Weiner
>             Fix For: 0.20.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-1759-v2.patch, HBASE-1759.patch
>
>
> I think that clients should have the ability to configure the scanner caching 
> setting on a per-scan basis via the org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Scan 
> object.  I propose adding a new caching property to the Scan class which 
> would override the HTable.scannerCaching property if set.  This would turn 
> the HTable.scannerCaching property into more of a default setting.
> The code inside ClientScanner (an inner-class implementation of 
> ResultScanner) would look like this:
> {code}
>       // Use the caching from the Scan.  If not set, use the default cache 
> setting for this table.
>       if (this.scan.getCaching() > 0) {
>         this.caching = this.scan.getCaching();
>       } else {
>         this.caching = HTable.this.scannerCaching;
>       }
> {code}
> Note that currently the only option for per-scan scanner caching 
> configuration is to modify the state of HTable for each Scan.  This could 
> lead to confusion when HTables are pooled since the pool would potentially 
> end up with many HTables all configured differently.
> I will attach a patch.  I'm looking forward to hearing your comments.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to