-1

Have been running solid with it for quite some time, unfortunately an important issue, HBASE-1737, dealing with load balancing on newly added servers, was accidentally undone by commit of HBASE-1743.

It has been re-applied to branch and trunk now.

JG

Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
+1 I ran it without any problem for a while. I asked Mathias if 1784
should kill it and he thinks no since it is not deterministic.

J-D

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Tim Sell<[email protected]> wrote:
+1

Running smoothly.
~Tim.

2009/8/19 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>:
+1

Survived days of pounding with no observable performance regression.

  - Andy




________________________________
From: stack <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:52:48 PM
Subject: ANN: hbase 0.20.0 Release Candidate 2 available for download

The second hbase 0.20.0 release candidate is available for download:

http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.0-candidate-2/

Near to 450 issues have been addressed since the 0.19 branch.  Release notes
are available here: http://su.pr/18zcEO <http://tinyurl.com/8xmyx9>.

HBase 0.20.0 runs on Hadoop 0.20.0.  Alot has changed since 0.19.x including
configuration fundamentals.  Be sure to read the 'Getting Started'
documentation in 0.20.0 available here: http://su.pr/8YQjHO

If you wish to bring your 0.19.x hbase data forward to 0.20.0, you will need
to run a migration.  See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToMigrate.
First read the overview and then go to the section, 'From 0.19.x to 0.20.x'.

Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.0?  Please vote +1/-1 by
Wednesday, August 25th.

Yours,
The HBasistas





Reply via email to