[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749962#action_12749962
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-1806:
--------------------------------------
These kinds of race conditions are another reason why moving stuff into ZK will
make life easier. Do you think we need to do something major for 0.20 or can
we wait for 0.21?
> Scanners do not respect row locks; scanner view could return a skewed view on
> row if ongoing update
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1806
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1806
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
>
> What I'm seeing is that BaseScanner misses updates made by an update
> milliseconds before -- even hundreds of milliseconds before. See hbase-1784
> where I'm seeing double-assignment of regions.
> Scanners do not respect row locks. They should else could return a row with
> partial updates committed. What if a .META. region has tens of storefiles
> and a scan does a get full row which takes a long time. Say an update comes
> in during this read. First it will go in because no row lock is outstanding.
> Second, we'll miss the edit given we look at things in order -- memstore,
> then each storefile down to the oldest. What if the update is followed by an
> update of server state; e.g. region is moved out of intransition state? And
> inside in same server, say the master, it makes decisions dependent on what
> it sees when it does a scanner#next; e.g. BaseScanner checking for assignment?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
