[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Paul Smith updated HBASE-2051: ------------------------------ Attachment: aconex-hbase-utils.zip I have attached a simple Maven project that we use here as a starting point for discussion. This won't compile anywhere else because it requires our internal Nexus repository, but someone with a little Maven experience could tweak this to remove the Parent POM definition and I think it should work. It currently depends only on Spring and Google Collections (both ASL 2 licensed). No test cases as yet sorry, this project was put together as part of a week long hackathon project as I experimented with HBase. I'm already an Apache member (psm...@apache.org) so can potentially be used as a basis for a more formal contribution if need be, but I'm sure there's lots to discuss with those more intimately familiar with day 2 day HBase coding. I could well be naive here, but this works for me and I find the code much more readable when using this. > Use builder pattern to improve usability of client API > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-2051 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2051 > Project: Hadoop HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Andrew Purtell > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: aconex-hbase-utils.zip > > > From Paul Smith up on hbase-user@: > {quote} > I think a good collection of useful builders and utilities that handle the > 80% case will help HBase gain much more traction. As an person starting with > HBase, there are a lot of concepts to get, Bytes definitely get in the way of > seeing the real underlying patterns. I'm a total believer in understanding > the internals to get the best out of a product, but that often comes after > experimentation, and these high-level libraries grease the wheels for faster > 'grok'ing the concepts. > Thinking out loud here, but something like this may be useful: > {code} > PutBuilder builder = new PutBuilder(hTable); > // first Row > builder.withRowKey(1stRowKey).withColumnFamily("foo") > .put("columnA", valueA) > .put("columnB",valueB); > // secondRow > builder.withRowKey(2ndRowKey).withColumnFamily("eek") > .put("columnC", valueC) > .put("columnD",valueD); > .. > builder.putAll(); > {code} > {quote} > Perhaps we could use the Builder pattern to achieve simplification (e.g. > HBASE-1990) and API support for multicalls (HBASE-1986, HBASE-1845) at the > same time. Method variants should accept byte[] or String for keys or values, > and lists. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.